The effectiveness of the drug «Vitosept» for the pre-incubation treatment of eggs
The article presents the results of the application of the drug "Vitosept", the active substance of which is sodium hypochlorite, for the pre-incubation treatment of eggs.
In the course of the analysis, the presence of bacteria, yeasts, molds including fungal microorganisms has been identified on the surface of the eggs. Microorganisms were identified and identified, among which the most common were Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Micrococcus halobius, Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, Salmonella typhimurium, Salmonella pullorum, Proteus vulgaris, Aeromonas spр. Depending on the degree of contamination, the microbial contamination of the egg surface ranged from 2 to 5 million microbial bodies per egg. The least contamination of eggs in the incubation and evisceration cabinets was observed at the level of the upper tier of the trays, most notably the lower ones.
Indicators of evapotranspiration of eggs at application of different concentrations of the drug "Vitosept" (Р <0,01-0,05%) were probably higher, while preservation of chickens up to 60 days of age was also 10% higher, even in the variant where it was used treatment of eggs by the classical method of formaldehyde pairs. In the amount of active sodium hypochlorite in the preparation, the percentage of underdeveloped fruits (frozen, dyspnea, weak and crippled) was also the lowest, compared to a batch of eggs, treated in the classical way, by the addition of formaldehyde or the same preparation, but with a slightly lower amount of active substance. The best disinfectant effect of the drug "Vitosept" is shown in the presence of sodium hypochlorite in the amount of 500 mg / liter. In the pre-incubation treatment of eggs of chickens with drug "Vitosept", the withdrawable of chickens, compared with the proportion of eggs, treated with formalin increases to 97.5%, and preservation - up to 95.7 %.
Yaroshenko F. Suchasni svitovi tendentsii rozvytku ptakhivnytstva. K.: Novyi druk. 2003. 335 s. (in Ukrainian).
BesulinV.I., HuzhvaV.I., Kutsak S.M. ta inshi. Ptakhivnytstvo i tekhnolohiia vyrobnytstva yaiets ta miasa ptytsi. Za red. V.I. Besulina. Bila Tserkva, 2003. 448 s. (in Ukrainian).
Saprikin L., Rjabokon' V. Prochnost' skorlupy jaic. Pticevodstvo, 1987, №10.s.27-31 (in Russian).
Kataralashvili A.Sh., Okolelova T.M., Puty snyzhenyia boia y nasechky yayts v promыshlennom ptytsevodstve. Efektyvne ptakhivnytstvo, 2006, №7. s.15-21 (in Ukrainian).
Zasiekin M.D., Zhmailov V.O., Ponomarenko N.P., Zasiekin D.A. Efektyvnist detoksykuiuchykh preparativ pry vyroshchuvanni kurchat-broileriv. Suchasne ptakhivnytstvo, 2008, №9 (70). s. 2-5 (in Ukrainian).
Capko A.P., Shhedrov I.N. Perbaksan dlja obezvrezhevanija poverhnosti skorlupy tovarnyh jaic. Veterinarija, 2006, №9. s. 38-39 (in Russian).
Kotsiumbas I.Ia., Velichenko O.B. Perspektyvy zastosuvannia hipokhlorytiv u veterynarnii medytsyni. Monohrafiia. Lviv, TzOV, VF Afisha, 2009. 312 s.(in Ukrainian).
Doklinichni doslidzhennia veterynarnykh likarskykh zasobiv / Monohrafiia za red. d.v.n., prof. Kotsiumbasa I.Ia. Lviv, «Triada plius», 2006. 360 s.(in Ukrainian).
Klinichni doslidzhennia veterynarnykh preparativ ta kormovykh dobavok. Monohrafiia za red.d.v.n., prof. Kotsiumbasa I.Ia. – Lviv, TOV Vydavnychyi dim «SAM», 2013. 252 s.(in Ukrainian).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.