Features of dezakarization in the conditions of successful support of costs

  • S. V. Zhyhalyuk Research Epizootology Station IVM NAAS, Rivne, Ukraine
  • R. M. Sachuk Research Epizootology Station IVM NAAS, Rivne, Ukraine
  • V. O. Pepko Rivne State Humanitarian University, Rivne, Ukraine.
  • Yu. R. Gunchak Stepan Gzhytskyi National University of Veterinary Medicine and Biotechnologies, Lviv, Ukraine
  • Ya. S. Stravskyi Ternopil State Medical University named after Gorbachevsky Ministry of Health of Ukraine, Ternopilʹ, Ukraine
  • S. A. Ponomarjova State Scientific-Research Control Institute for Veterinary Medicinal Products and Feed Additives, Lviv, Ukraine
Keywords: close, dezakarization, coefficient of protective action, biological efficiency


The results of approbation of the improved method of dezakarization of wild ungulates in conditions of semi-free maintenance containing both animal treatment and the rehabilitation of places of their accumulation with new amitraze-based preparative compositions are described.

The entrances have applied modern, scientifically-based, integrated approaches to the organization of preventive and therapeutic anti-parasitic measures. This allowed, with minimal cost, without the stress factor, without reducing the trophy properties of the game, to control the number of parasites at a relatively safe level. The method provides an independent sanation of animals attractive to them by the emulsion of insecto-acaricide. In this case, as an attractant, solvent and repellent, used water is used. Places for feeding animals were treated with a new insecto-acaricidal preparation with a disinfectant effect “Acarotak E” for livestock processing. Also, individual therapy with the new drug ivermectin series has been tested.

The high efficiency of the applied drugs, in particular the maximum values, was established. The protective factor of the “Acarotak D.V.” agent reached 76%. The biological efficiency of the “Acarotak E” agent for 1 day amounted to 93,3% and remained high for 14 days.


Katiukha S. M. (2012). Patent Ukrainy na korysnu model № 69220 «Sposib obliku chyselnosti krovosysnykh dvokrylykh komakh na tvaryni za dopomohoiu tsyfrovoi fotokamery» Biul. № 8. (in Ukrainian).

Abuladze K. Y., Nykolskyi S. N., & Kolabskyi N. A. (1975). Parazytolohyia i invazionnue bolezni selskokhoziaistvennuh zhyvotnuh. M.: Kolos. (in Russian).

Byriukov A. A. (1998). Sanytarno-toksykolohycheskaia otsenka Amytraza kak sredstva borbu s demodekozom sobak: avtoref. dys. na soyskanye uch. stepeny kand. vet. nauk: spets. 16.00.06 «Veterynarnaia sanytaryia i ekolohyia». M. 23 s. (in Russian).

Boiko N. N. (1979) Vlyianye razlychnukh kontsentratsyi i sochetanyi rastvorov dymeksyda na techenye ranevoho protsessa. Klynycheskaia khyrurhyia. 1, 64-65. (in Ukrainian).

Beker E., Uarton H. (1955). Vvedenye v akarolohyiu. M.: Y.*L. (in Russian).

Hembytskyi P. A., Voyntseva Y. Y. (1998). Polymernui byotsydnui preparat polyheksametylenhuanydyn. Zaporozhe: Polyhraf, 44. (in Ukrainian).

Manuilova O. (2012) Rekomendatsyy po protyvoparazytarnum rabotam dlia koputnykh. Okhota – natsyonalnui okhotnychyi zhurnal. 9(54), 44-47. (in Russian).

Talanyn F.A. (1981). Proyzvodstvo berestovoho dehtia M.: Lesnaia promushlenost. 72 s. (in Russian).

Fasulaty K.K. (1971). Polevoe yzuchenye nazemnukh bezpozvonochnukh. "Vusshaia shkola". M. (in Russian).

Yakubchak O.M., Khomenko V.I., & Midyk S.V. (2005). Veterynarna dezinfektsiia, dezodoratsiia, dezinsektsiia, dezinvaziia, deratyzatsiia. K.: NAU. 75 s. [Normatyvnyi dokument Derzhdepartamentu veterynarnoi medytsyny. Instruktsiia.]. (in Ukrainian).

How to Cite
Zhyhalyuk, S. V., Sachuk, R. M., Pepko, V. O., Gunchak, Y. R., Stravskyi, Y. S., & Ponomarjova, S. A. (2019). Features of dezakarization in the conditions of successful support of costs. Scientific and Technical Bulletin оf State Scientific Research Control Institute of Veterinary Medical Products and Fodder Additives аnd Institute of Animal Biology, 20(2), 268-275. https://doi.org/10.36359/scivp.2019-20-2.34